It will be interesting to see whether the Post includes the latest "controversial" figure of 655,000 "extra" deaths in Iraq in its weekly rundown of casualties. The Post often runs a box with the hed Iraq Casualties, frequently during the week and always on Saturday. It currently includes the earlier study claiming 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths as a footnote to the box.
The box that appears with today's story isn't what I mean--it's more like this one; I scanned that example last year when I thought the probably bogus 100,000 figure had been introduced by careless weekend editors. Wrong!
The footnote, which I can't find online, typically reads:
The Pentagon does not tally civilian casualties. A 2004 study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore found that 100,000 Iraqi civilians may have died as a result of the war. That number was extrapolated from household surveys in Iraq.
As I said in my first post this afternoon, today's story by David Brown refers to the 2004 study as "controversial." The Saturday footnote never does.

![[HOTLIST]](http://bluestar.typepad.com/govt_150x75.jpg)
Comments